Key
The Comprehensive Final Examination
Math 1107
Spring Semester 2009
CJ Alverson
Protocol
You will use only the
following resources: Your
individual calculator; Your individual tool-sheets (two (2) 8.5 by 11 inch
sheets); Your writing utensils; Blank Paper (provided by me); This copy of the
hourly and
the tables provided by me. Do not share these
resources with anyone else. Show complete detail and work for full credit.
Follow case study solutions and sample hourly keys in presenting your
solutions.
Work all four
cases. Using only one
side of the blank sheets provided, present your work. Do not write on both
sides of the sheets provided, and present your work only on these sheets. When
you’re done: Print your name on a blank sheet of paper. Place your toolsheet, test and work under this sheet, and turn it all
in to me. Do not share information with any other students during this
hourly.
Sign and
Acknowledge: I agree to follow this
protocol. Initial:___
______________________________________________________________________________________
Name
(PRINTED)
Signature Date
Case One | Color Slot Machine | Conditional
Probabilities
Here is our slot machine – on
each trial, it produces a color sequence, using the table below:
Sequence* |
Probability |
BBRRYRRR |
.10 |
GGRGBRRB |
.10 |
BBYYGGBR |
.15 |
GRRGBRGG |
.10 |
BGYRYGYY |
.25 |
YYGRRBBY |
.10 |
YBYYBGRR |
.20 |
Total |
1.00 |
*B-Blue, G-Green, R-Red, Y-Yellow
Compute the following conditional probabilities:
Pr
Pr
Pr
Show all work for full credit.
Key
Pr
Prior
Pr
Sequence* |
Probability |
BBRRYRRR |
.10 |
BBYYGGBR |
.15 |
BGYRYGYY |
.25 |
YYGRRBBY |
.10 |
YBYYBGRR |
.20 |
Total |
0.80 |
Pr
Pr
.10 + .15 + .25 +
.10 + .20 = 0.80
Joint
Pr
Sequence* |
Probability |
BBRRYRRR |
.10 |
YYGRRBBY |
.10 |
YBYYBGRR |
.20 |
Total |
0.40 |
Pr
Pr
.10 +.10 + .20 =
0.40
Conditional = Joint / Prior
Pr
Pr
Prior
Pr
Sequence* |
Probability |
BBRRYRRR |
.10 |
GGRGBRRB |
.10 |
BBYYGGBR |
.15 |
GRRGBRGG |
.10 |
Total |
.45 |
Pr
Pr
Joint
Pr
Sequence* |
Probability |
BBRRYRRR |
.10 |
BBYYGGBR |
.15 |
Total |
.25 |
Pr
Pr
Conditonal = Joint / Prior
Pr
Pr
Prior
Pr{ Green Shows}
Sequence* |
Probability |
GGRGBRRB |
.10 |
BBYYGGBR |
.15 |
GRRGBRGG |
.10 |
BGYRYGYY |
.25 |
YYGRRBBY |
.10 |
YBYYBGRR |
.20 |
Total |
.90 |
Pr
Pr
.10+.15+.10+.25+.10+.20=.90
Joint
Pr
Sequence* |
Probability |
GGRGBRRB |
.10 |
BBYYGGBR |
.15 |
GRRGBRGG |
.10 |
BGYRYGYY |
.25 |
YYGRRBBY |
.10 |
YBYYBGRR |
.20 |
Total |
.90 |
Pr
Pr
.10+.15+.10+.25+.10+.20=.90
Conditional =
Joint/Prior
Pr
Pr
Case Two | Descriptive Statistics | Sea Weaselsä
Sea Weaselsä are instant
pets, distributed as a kit - Sea Weasel Eggsä , Sea Weasel Water
Conditionerä and Sea Weasel Foodä . A Sea
Weaselä Kit is started by placing the Sea Weasel Eggsä , Sea
Weasel Water Conditionerä and some water in a container. The eggs will then
hatch, producing Sea Weaselsä , and some of them will survive. A random sample of Sea
Weaselä Kits is selected, each selected kit is started, and
the number of surviving Sea Weaselsä is counted one week
after start. Here are the Sea Weaselä counts per kit
20 23 25 26 27 32 35 41 42 42
45 47 48 51 56 60 61 62 65 70 73 76 84 89 91 92 96 98 104 109 117 124 130 132
135 138 140 142 145 151 160 162 165 166 167 171 174 174
176 178 179 181 182 183 187 275
Compute and interpret the following statistics: sample size, p00, p25,
p50, p75, p100, (p75 – p25),
(p100 – p25), (p50-p25). Show complete detail and work for full
credit. Follow case study solutions and sample hourly keys in presenting your
solutions.
Numbers
Quantile
Estimate
100% Max 275.0
99% 275.0
95% 183.0
90% 179.0
75% Q3 163.5
50% Median 101.0
25% Q1 53.5
10% 32.0
5% 25.0
1% 20.0
0% Min 20.0
n p00 p25
p50 p75 p100
R21 R31 R41
56 20
53.5 101 163.5
275 47.5 110
221.5
R21 = P50 – P25 = 101 – 53.5 = 47.5
R31 = P75 – P25 = 163.5 – 53.5 = 110
R41 = P100 – P25 = 275 – 53.5 = 221.5
Interpretation
There are 56 Sea Weasel kits in our sample.
The kit in the sample with the smallest yield yields 20 Sea Weasels.
Approximately 25% of the kits in the sample yield 53.5 or fewer Sea
Weasels.
Approximately 50% of the kits in the sample yield 101 or fewer Sea
Weasels.
Approximately 75% of the kits in the sample yield 163.5 or fewer Sea
Weasels.
The kit in the sample with the largest yield yields 275 Sea Weasels.
Approximately 25% of the kits in the sample yield between 53.5 and 101
Sea Weasels – the largest possible difference in kit yield between any pair of
kits in the lower middle quarter sample is 47.5 Sea
Weasels.
Approximately 50% of the kits in the sample yield between 53.5 and 163.5
Sea Weasels – the largest possible difference in kit yield between any pair of
kits in the middle half sample is 110 Sea Weasels.
Approximately 75% of the kits in the sample yield between 53.5 and 275
Sea Weasels – the largest possible difference in kit yield between any pair of
kits in the upper ¾ sample is 221.5 Sea Weasels.
Case Three | Confidence
Interval: Population Proportion | Sea Weaselsä
Using the data
and context from Case Two, compute and interpret a 95% confidence interval for
the population proportion of
Sea Weaselä Kits with yields of 150 or more Sea Weaselsä. Show all work for full credit. Fully discuss the results. This discussion must include a clear discussion of
the population and the population proportion, the family of samples, the family
of intervals and the interpretation of the interval.
Numbers
20 23 25 26 27 32 35 41 42 42 45 47 48 51 56 60 61 62 65 70 73 76 84 89 91 92 96 98
104 109 117 124 130 132 135 138 140 142 145 151 160 162 165 166 167 171
174 174 176 178 179 181 182 183 187 275
Event = “Sea Weasel kit yields 150 or more Sea Weasels”
e = sample event count = 17
n = sample size = 56
p = e/n = 17/56 »
0.30357
sdp
= sqrt(p*(1 – p)/n) = sqrt((17/56)*(39/56)/56)
»
0.061443
lower95 = p – (2*sdp)
»
.30357 – (2*0.061443) » 0.18068
upper95 = p + (2*sdp)
»
.30357 + (2*0.061443) » 0.42646
From this row: 2.00 0.022750 0.95450,
Z »
2.00
Report the interval as [0.181, 0.426].
Interpretation
Each member of the Family of Samples (FoS) is a single random sample of
56 Sea Weasel kits – the Family of Samples consists of every possible sample of
this type.
From each member of the FoS, compute e = number of kits in the sample
yielding 150 or more weasels. Then compute p=e/56, sdp
= sqrt(p*(1 – p)/n), and then the interval [ lower bound = p – (2*sdp),
p + (2*sdp)] – repeating these calculations for each
member sample yields a Family of Intervals (FoI),
approximately 95% of which cover the population proportion of Sea Weasel kits
that yield 150 or more Sea Weasels. If our single computed interval resides in
this 95% supermajority, then between 18.1 and 42.6% of Sea Weasel kits yield
150 or more Sea Weasels.
Case Four | Hypothesis Test – Categorical Goodness-of-Fit | Traumatic Brain
Injury
The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is the most widely used system for scoring
the level of consciousness of a patient who has had a traumatic brain injury.
GCS is based on the patient's best eye-opening, verbal, and motor responses.
Each response is scored and then the sum of the three scores is computed. That
is,
Augmented
Mild = 13, 14, 15
Moderate = 9, 10, 11, 12
Severe/Coma = 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Pre-admission Death/PAD/DOA = 0
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an insult to the brain from an external mechanical
force, possibly leading to permanent or temporary impairments of cognitive,
physical, and psychosocial functions with an associated diminished or altered
state of consciousness. Consider a random sample of patients with TBI, with GCS
at initial treatment and diagnosis listed below:
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5,
5, 5, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 7, 7, 7, 7, 8, 8, 8,
9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 10, 10, 10, 10,
11, 11, 11, 12, 12, 12,
13, 13, 13, 14, 14, 14, 14, 14, 14, 15, 15
Our
null hypothesis is that TBI case outcomes are 20% Pre-admission Deaths, 50%
Severe, 20% Moderate and 10% Mild. Test this Hypothesis. Show your work. Completely discuss and interpret your
test results, as indicated in class and case study summaries.
Numbers
Pre-admission
Death (PAD)
ObservedPAD = 14
ExpectedPAD = n*PPAD= 71*.20
= 14.2
ErrorPAD = (ObservedPAD
– ExpectedPAD)2/ExpectedPAD
= (14 –14.2)2/14.2 » 0.00282
Severe (GCS
in 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8)
ObservedSevere = 28
ExpectedSevere = n*P =
71*.50 = 35.5
ErrorSevere = (ObservedSevere
– ExpectedSevere)2/ExpectedSevere
= (28 –35.5)2/35.5 » 1.58451
Moderate
(GCS in 9, 10, 11, 12)
ObservedModerate = 18
ExpectedModerate = n*PModerate = 71*.20 = 14.2
ErrorModerate = (ObservedModerate – ExpectedModerate)2/ExpectedModerate
= (18 –14.2)2/14.2 » 1.01690
Mild (GCS
in 13, 14, 15)
ObservedMild = 11
ExpectedMild = n*PMild = 71*.10 = 7.1
ErrorMild = (ObservedMild
– ExpectedMild)2/ExpectedMild
= (11 –7.1)2/7.1 » 2.14225
Total Error
= ErrorPAD + ErrorSevere + ErrorModerate
+ ErrorMild » 0.00282 +
1.58451 + 1.01690 + 2.14225 » 4.74648 over 4
categories.
From rows: 4 4.6416 0.200 and 4 4.9566 0.175, .175 £ p £ .200.
Each member
of the Family of Samples(FoS) is a random sample of 71 Traumatic Brain
Injury patients – the FoS consists of all possible
samples of this type.
From each
member sample of the FoS, compute the following items
at each level of severity:
Pre-admission
Death (PAD)
ObservedPAD
ExpectedPAD = n*PPAD= 71*.20
= 14.2
ErrorPAD = (ObservedPAD
– ExpectedPAD)2/ExpectedPAD
Severe (GCS
in 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8)
ObservedSevere
ExpectedSevere = n*PSevere = 71*.50 = 35.5
ErrorSevere = (ObservedSevere
– ExpectedSevere)2/ExpectedSevere
Moderate
(GCS in 9, 10, 11, 12)
ObservedModerate
ExpectedModerate = n*PModerate = 71*.20 = 14.2
ErrorModerate = (ObservedModerate – ExpectedModerate)2/ExpectedModerate
Mild (GCS
in 13, 14, 15)
ObservedMild
ExpectedMild = n*PMild = 71*.10 = 7.1
ErrorMild = (ObservedMild
– ExpectedMild)2/ExpectedMild
Then
compute Total Error = ErrorPAD +
ErrorSevere + ErrorModerate
+ ErrorMild
Repeating these calculations for each member sample of the FoS yields a Family of Errors (FoE).
If the
population proportions for TBI Severity are PPAD=.20, PSevere
=.50, PModerate = .20 and PMild = .10, then between 17.5% and 20% of the
member samples of the FoS yield errors as severe or
more extreme than our single computed error. Our sample does not seem to
present significant evidence against the null hypothesis.
Table 1. Means and Proportions
Z(k)
PROBRT PROBCENT 0.05 0.48006
0.03988 0.10 0.46017
0.07966 0.15 0.44038
0.11924 0.20 0.42074
0.15852 0.25 0.40129
0.19741 0.30 0.38209
0.23582 0.35 0.36317
0.27366 0.40 0.34458
0.31084 0.45 0.32636
0.34729 0.50 0.30854
0.38292 0.55 0.29116
0.41768 0.60 0.27425
0.45149 0.65 0.25785
0.48431 0.70 0.24196
0.51607 0.75 0.22663
0.54675 0.80 0.21186
0.57629 0.85 0.19766
0.60467 0.90 0.18406
0.63188 0.95 0.17106
0.65789 1.00 0.15866
0.68269 |
Z(k)
PROBRT PROBCENT 1.05 0.14686
0.70628 1.10 0.13567
0.72867 1.15 0.12507
0.74986 1.20 0.11507
0.76986 1.25 0.10565
0.78870 1.30 0.09680
0.80640 1.35 0.088508
0.82298 1.40 0.080757
0.83849 1.45 0.073529
0.85294 1.50 0.066807
0.86639 1.55 0.060571
0.87886 1.60 0.054799
0.89040 1.65 0.049471
0.90106 1.70 0.044565
0.91087 1.75 0.040059
0.91988 1.80 0.035930
0.92814 1.85 0.032157
0.93569 1.90 0.028717
0.94257 1.95 0.025588
0.94882 2.00
0.022750 0.95450 |
Z(k)
PROBRT PROBCENT 2.05 0.020182
0.95964 2.10 0.017864
0.96427 2.15 0.015778
0.96844 2.20 0.013903
0.97219 2.25 0.012224
0.97555 2.30 0.010724
0.97855 2.35 0.009387
0.98123 2.40 0.008198
0.98360 2.45 0.007143
0.98571 2.50 0.006210
0.98758 2.55 0.005386
0.98923 2.60 0.004661
0.99068 2.65 0.004025
0.99195 2.70 .0034670
0.99307 2.75 .0029798
0.99404 2.80 .0025551
0.99489 2.85 .0021860
0.99563 2.90 .0018658
0.99627 2.95 .0015889
0.99682 3.00 .0013499
0.99730 |
Table 2. Categories/Goodness of Fit
Categories
ERROR p-value 3 0.0000 1.000 3 0.2107
0.900
3 0.4463 0.800 3 0.7133
0.700
3 1.0217 0.600 3 1.3863
0.500
3 1.5970 0.450 3 1.8326
0.400
3 2.0996 0.350 3 2.4079
0.300
3 2.7726 0.250 3 3.2189 0.200 3 4.6052
0.100
3 4.8159 0.090 3 5.0515
0.080
3 5.3185 0.070
3 5.6268 0.060 3 5.9915
0.050
3 6.4378 0.040 3 7.0131
0.030
3 7.8240 0.020 3 9.2103
0.010 |
Categories
ERROR p-value 4 0.0000 1.000 4 0.5844 0.900 4 1.0052 0.800 4 1.4237 0.700 4 1.8692 0.600 4 2.3660 0.500 4 2.6430 0.450 4 2.9462 0.400 4 3.2831 0.350 4 3.6649 0.300 4 4.1083 0.250 4 4.6416
0.200 4 4.9566
0.175 4 5.3170 0.150 4 5.7394 0.125 4 6.2514 0.100 4 6.4915 0.090 4 6.7587 0.080 4 7.0603 0.070 4 7.4069 0.060 4 7.8147 0.050 4 8.3112 0.040 4 8.9473 0.030 4 9.8374 0.020 4 11.3449 0.010 |
Categories
ERROR p-value 5 0.0000 1.000 5 1.0636 0.900 5 1.6488 0.800 5 2.1947 0.700 5 2.7528 0.600 5 3.3567 0.500 5 3.6871 0.450 5 4.0446 0.400 5 4.4377 0.350 5 4.8784 0.300 5 5.3853 0.250 5 5.9886 0.200 5 6.3423 0.175 5 6.7449 0.150 5 7.2140 0.125 5 7.7794 0.100 5 8.0434 0.090 5 8.3365 0.080 5 8.6664 0.070 5 9.0444 0.060 5 9.4877 0.050 5 10.0255 0.040 5 10.7119 0.030 5 11.6678 0.020 5 13.2767 0.010 |